Commenters also argued the rule conflicted with other provisions of the Refugee Convention and Protocol. Commenters pointed out that Short article 31 from the Refugee Conference prohibits states from imposing incorrect penalties for irregular entry, which commenters argued bundled administrative penalties and limitations on access to asylum.At last
88 FR at 11705. The exigent circumstances giving increase to this rule arose following the Asylum Processing IFR was issued and require departing from the overall strategy during the Asylum Processing IFR in particular techniques— i.e.,Relatedly, quite a few commenters pointed to United Nations Higher Commissioner for Refugees (“UNHCR”) state
88 FR at 11706-07 (noting that the U4U and CHNV parole procedures resulted in vastly less irregular border crossings, demonstrating that noncitizens from Ukraine, Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela were in the position to benefit from the U4U and CHNV parole procedures). The good results on the U4U and CHNV parole procedures indicates that these